How is that people always ask doctors for their specialisations
but assume that every writer should have written a book? How is it fair to club all writers in one block but ask chefs
specifically which cuisine they cook?
For my consolation, I’d like to believe it’s ignorance. And now, it’d like to make things clear. It’s true I write to make a living, but I’m not
that kind of writer.
So let me introduce you to some types which I hope will give you a clue on how you can spare a writer the embarrassment of explaining him or herself to you.
We begin with the classic, the typical author, the
long-distance champ who can fill a book with a story. They are the culprits guilty of the stereotype, writing page after page chasing linguistic glory.
(So that's not me, just to make things clear.)
Closely following are the most fun kind of “writer”, the
inspired millions who think they are literary. Their desperate-to-impress, mostly self-important, fantastical scribbling can make you "blink.
Literally."
Next are my favourite kind, the script writers whom I believe are the underdogs. Their words are behind most entertainment, existing outside flat pages and inside stage blocks.
There’s the technical writer, the instructional designer,
and the content developer et al; very different kinds of writers indeed. They’re
perfectly suited to make a business look good and write stuff you wouldn't ordinarily read.
Closing my list up are copywriters and those who write short
copy. They're usually punning and penning stuff that can be pretty witty. Their belief? Hey, why fill pages and
pages when you can do with one-liners and brevity?
And that’s a small introduction to help you not mix us writers up.
Please remember that just because someone's a writer, writing a book or blog or
a whatever-writers-are-supposed-to-write might not be their cup.
Just be tactful next time, okay?
Issued in public interest to protect writers from stupid assumptions.